Regarding gorkha soldiers involvment in Jallianwala bhag massacre, I would like to add that General Dyer was officer in punjab regiment and not gorkha regiment.
It is said that in order to prevent communal riots in punjab, because soldiers from one particular community in punjab were involved, gorkha soldiers were falsely named. The logic given that gorkhas soldiers were nepali and so foreigners, won't cause communal tension in punjab.
You have to understand one thing; we gorkhas carry a reputation. Right from the time during partition of punjab, or whether its insurgencies in north east, punjab , j&k, sikh riots etc, or any peace keeping operation around the world when ever the government needs the army that will not take sides, they always call gorkhas.
|
Home
 Timeline Soldiers of Empire 1919 The Amritsar Massacre
|
 Jallianwala Bagh Memorial Image Gurkhas' qualities of loyalty and self-discipline could count against them when badly led and operating in a politically-charged situation, as at Amritsar, India, at the height of a civil disobedience campaign called by the Indian National Congress. 90 Indian Army troops, including 25 Gurkhas, some of whom were newly trained recruits, were ordered by Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer to fire on an unarmed crowd of demonstrators in Jallianwala Bagh, a walled enclosure outside the holy Sikh temple in Amritsar. Officially 375 people died and over a 1,000 were injured but local authorities put the numbers much, much higher. This notorious action drew unwelcome attention to the Gurkhas who, in the eyes of Indian nationalists, inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s non-violent campaign, were the ultimate mercenaries. During the inter-war period in India, as the Indian nationalist movement grew, Gurkhas were widely viewed as tools being used by the British Empire to suppress Indian freedom.
|
